|
Protect your assets during shipment and long-term with this revolutionary new packaging material - Intercept Shrinkfilm(tm)!!! Now companies and militaries can protect nearly everything from corrosion, electro-static discharge damage, and even some mold/mildew attacks with a single safe product. Unlike VCIs, Intercept Technology is safe for personnel and the equipment it is meant to protect; protects better: works longer (up to 10 years per mil of Intercept Technology(tm) resin); works in any humidity and temperature: protects optics, electronics, hard drives and CDs, rubber, multi-metals, ammunition; weapons; and much more. Most VCIs are hazardous despite marketing to the contrary!!! If you want to know the truth about VCIs click here Intercept Technology(tm), which is inserted into our Intercept Shrinkfilm(tm), uses activated copper as a part of the plastic matrix to remove the corrosive gases (ozone, chlorides, sulfides) that cause corrosion. See our extensive library of technical documents and tests for verification. Intercept Shrinkfilm, is only available from FPM Inc. and is used just like regular shrinkfilm.
For further information contact FPM Inc. Or
FPM Inc. Technical (Randy Dutton) Visit
the Intercept Shrinkfilm website Engineered Material Inc., as the Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovation licensee, produces Intercept Shrinkfilm for FPM. Sample Intercept Shrinkfilm for testing or evaluation currently is available. Sizes are available to 20-foot wide in gusseted rolls.
From EMI President Keith Donaldson 6/6/00 I am including a Power Point Presentation that I developed with the people at Bell Labs. The presentation was used internally at one of their meetings at which the merits of VCIs were discussed. It was the unanimous decision of the committee to ban the use of VCIs at Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovation except for the rare instance of short term, severe environmental storage of bare metal. Through all of their testing the only situation in which VCIs outperformed Intercept was when bare metal was conditioned for 2 weeks inside a VCI bag and inside of a Static Intercept bag. The bags were completely opened and the parts placed inside a humidity chamber. Naturally since the part was out of the Intercept the SI protected part did not fare as well as the Intercept. However, in all tests where Intercept was left basically intact around the part, SI outperformed VCIs -- in every case. Additional testing was done with populated boards placed inside of a VCI bag and SI bag. The samples were then exposed to a normal environment, complete with dust and particles -- not normally present in VCI testing. The boards were then tested in a humid environment. As soon as the humidity reached 60% all of the boards that had been placed in VCIs failed -- the VCI oils had attracted the dust and cemented it onto the board. Since dust is hygroscopic (water attracting) the dust hydrated making the particle conductive providing a fault path. All of the boards in VICs failed --100% failures with VCIs above 60% RH. There were no failures with the Intercept samples. Click
Below For Intercept Presentation : |